Talk:Route Trident/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 11:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 11:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments
I've had a quick read through and this article appears to have most, if not all, the necessary requirements of WP:WIAGA; so I anticipate that it could gain GA-status this time round.

I've seen several sentences that I don't like, those having multiple "and"s for instance. I will probably clean those up as I carry out the in depth review. At this point I will be mostly highlighting problems if any (excluding "and"s that I fix myself), so if I don't comment on a particular section/subsection that tends to mean that its OK. I will also be reviewing the WP:Lead last. Pyrotec (talk) 22:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Extension -
 * I missed this point, but it was kindly drawn to my attention by Malleus Fatuorum. Ref 14 states: ..."which resulted in the project being delayed from its original finish date of July to October 2010", since it is now December 2010 a status update is to be expected, i.e. is either open or further delayed. Pyrotec (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Overall comments
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'll be awarding this article GA-status once minor corrective action has been carried out. It's informative and well referenced, but the grammar needed improving: Malleus Fatuorum has been working diligently on this. Pyrotec (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added as much current info as I can find (The MoD doesn't seem to be releasing much at the moment). I will try to go through for grammar etc. when I get chance (probably next week).  Thanks for bearing with me and also to Malleus for his extensive copyediting - Dumelow (talk) 08:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. From your note, I was not expecting you for another week. I'm now awarding the article GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 09:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't expecting to be free, but I managed to get some weather-related time off! Thanks for the GA - Dumelow (talk) 09:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)