Talk:Rowan v. United States Post Office Department

Why is this flagged in need of attention from an expert on the subject?
There is nothing in the article that is unclear to me. Yes, it's short, but there really isn't more to say. Bob (talk) 20:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree; it looks like good form to me, and there are obviously no issues spelled out on this talk page. I'm removing the flag.  --Lockley (talk) 03:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Volokh citation?
Can anyone help me find the actual source for this citation? I'd like to read it, but I don't know how to look for it. Googling isn't turning anything up:
 * It thus a created a quasi-exception to free speech in cases where a person is held as a 'captive audience'. &lt;ref&gt;&lt;/ref&gt;

-- DMahalko (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

"Captive audience" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Captive audience. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 9 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 02:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)