Talk:Rowland Lee (bishop)

Requested move 7 October 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

– No indication of a consensus that this entry, marked as a stub, delineating the "hanging bishop" from 500 years ago (who is referenced throughout the article as "Leigh"), depicts a historical figure of such prominence that he becomes the unquestioned WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over Rowland Lee (composer), director Rowland V. Lee (also known as simply Rowland Lee) as well as similarly-named swimmer Roland Lee, Rowland Leigh (MP) and screenwriter Rowland Leigh. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Rowland Lee → Rowland Lee (bishop)
 * Rowland Lee (disambiguation) → Rowland Lee
 * Support clearly not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC blindlynx (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support. The nom's rationale is wrong - primarytopic has nothing to with being "a historical figure of such prominence that he becomes the unquestioned WP:PRIMARYTOPIC". Instead, using the actual criteria of usage and significance, we see that this topic gets |Rowland_Lee|Rowland_V._Lee well less than half of pageviews, so does not qualify. No evidence has been presented about long-term significance. Dohn joe (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per Dohn joe.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Absent the instant recognition of such multi-name primary topics as John Kennedy, Winston Churchill or Elizabeth Taylor and lacking discussions establishing consensus, most primary topics are either grandfathered as the first entry created under that name or chosen as a result of personal opinion. Although recent extended argumentations at Talk:David Jack or Talk:John Nutt ultimately failed to dislodge these marginal-primacy individuals from their positions, they also demonstrated that a number of longtime Wikipedians feel that being a historical figure of sufficient prominence does play a role in establishing consensus for primacy. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.