Talk:Royal Canin/Archives/2021

Discussion regarding recent revisions
, : I've moved the discussion to this page. The two revisions we are concerned with is this version, and the current version of the page. The earlier diff is the version which does not contain the promotional prose originally added by Royal Canin PR representative, and contains copyedits by me. Otherwise it is basically the version from March 11 (before both of us were involved). Looking at the difference between the two, we can see these new additions dilute and changes content that cites secondary sources, along with adding content in a promotional tone to the article without citing secondary sources. There are some minor wording changes that can be accepted, but I believe these changes would be better suited for the earlier version linked above, since it does not have a promotional tone and has already gone through some copyediting. In summary, we should make any updates using the earlier version instead of working off the current one, as it would be more organized and would not have a promotional tone. I look forward to your opinions. Yeeno  (talk) 🍁 18:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Yeeno, I'm sorry that life got in the way. Whoops. I'm a bit confused on the diffs provided, but I'm reading as best as I can. I'd like to hear from the other editor; what is your side?  Sennecaster   ( What now? ) 03:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I am pinging again as they have been repeatedly re-adding their content before addressing these concerns. Renan Luis Moraes, would you please stop editing and instead build consensus for your changes? In particular, I object to the Nutrients versus Ingredients section, which is promotional, in the sense that it is sourced only to the companies website and states in Wikipedia's voice that this companies approach is better than others'. I also object to the second part of your Controversial sponsoring section, which consists of unsourced content that has the effect of amplifying positive parts of the company's response to a controversy. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)