Talk:Royal Crescent, Brighton

Statue really Coade stone?
The rapid weathering described here is inconsistent with descriptions of Coade stone. See my comment there.
 * —  crism ( talk )  20:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sources suggest that the poor design and manufacture contributed to the damage. The designer is described in at least one source as "mediocre".  The position (especially in those days, when the crescent was extremely isolated) was also very exposed indeed, facing the prevailing wind which was laden with salt from the sea.  Anyway, all sources do indeed confirm that it was Coade stone.   Hassocks  5489 (tickets please!)  21:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Royal Crescent, Brighton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Dus2kPHo?url=http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/ to http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/StatisticsPage/default.aspx?StatsCounty=EAST%20SUSSEX
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509061159/http://www.regencysociety.org/latest/plaques.html to http://regencysociety.org/latest/plaques.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)