Talk:Royal Mail rubber band

Title
I can't think of one, but i just can't help but feel it needs a better title. Uksam88 (talk) 17:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Something more snappy, eh? --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It just seems very Ronseally.--Uksam88 (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I pondered the plural, but seem to remember we frown on plural titles. I'm a little uncertain whether the article is discussing Royal Mail rubber bands, or campaign and media reaction to their being discarded. I'm open to a change if anyone has a suggestion - be bold. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah I see where you come from on the direction of the article. It just seem's too be a little trivial, and perhaps not notable enough, if it's an article about the bands (which royal mail doesn't produce) where as an article based upon the campaign by Keep Britain Tidy possibly is. I would make a title change, and even some edits to the page, but i have a conflict of interest here ;) Uksam88 (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * But it's wider than the Keep Britain Tidy campaign: UK media has wobbled on about RMRBs for much longer than KBT have been campaigning on the issue. I'd like to take the "cultural phenomenon" route, but I do not have a reliable source for that assertion. I'm kinda hoping that the references demonstrate there is something notable in the article. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Purpose
It seems like the article would benefit from a discussion of why the Royal Mail uses these rubber bands, and perhaps a picture of them being used as intended. From the current tone of the article, and the 3 pictures, it appears that the main purpose of them is to be strewn about the forest floor. — PyTom (talk) 16:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If anyone needs helping inputting that i should be able to help so just leave a message on my talk page, don't want to be editing myself due to WP:COI. I might even be able to get a picture of them being used at work. Uksam88 (talk) 17:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Unusual Articles
I've added this to Unusual Articles. Feel free to edit the blurb to something more appropriate--T1980 (talk) 17:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Ceasing to be red
An editor added "ceased to be red in 2010" in 2013, with no source and an edit summary of "Source? Postal Worker." I can't find any sources to support this, and there are a couple of articles from 2011/12 that still talk about them being red. It's possible they were gradually phased out in different areas of the UK, but I can't find any sources to back this up. I've cut the claim from the article for now. --McGeddon (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * In Birmingham they're using bog-standard light-brown bands now. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * As a former 25-year employee of Royal Mail, going back to the days when BT was still Post Office Telephones, I never saw a single red rubber band so this article is all news to me.  All the rubber bands I encountered (and there were lots of them)  were all a nondescript tan colour.162.196.161.203 (talk) 03:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * In Staffordshire they haven't be red for at least six years.

Recycling scheme
The article says 'The Royal Mail now has a rubber band recycling scheme', giving the address of an RM delivery service in Belfast to post bands to for recycling. But is this a real scheme? There is, admittedly, a source for the information, namely https://www.wastenotwantnotliving.co.uk/recycling-database/can-i-recycle-rubber-bands/, but in the absence of confirmation I'm not convinced that it hasn't just been posted by some irritated person wanting his local HQ to get overwhelmed with letters enclosing bands from all over the country. By the way, it has been claimed (and it is probably in one of the references) that bands get dropped because they break rather than through neglect. That is manifestly not the case as most of the bands on the ground are still intact. --Brian Josephson (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)