Talk:Royal touch/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 08:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Calvin999 and I am reviewing this article.


 * Review
 * I think if you're going to link queens regnant of England, then you should also link the kings of England and the kings of France.
 * The link leads not to an article about queens regnant of England, but to an article explaining what queen regnant means. I can remove the link if you think it would be better without it. I could also reword it to say "monarchs of England and France", though that is very similar to the lead sentence.
 * No I think it's good, but I thought perhaps for the kings that you could link to a list of kings. — Calvin999  20:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * In England, Saint Edward the Confessor (r. 1042–1066) was said to be the first monarch to possess the healing power of the royal touch. → Something like this needs to have a citation at the end of the sentence to support it.
 * I copied it over. Surtsicna (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * notably including → most notably
 * Done. Surtsicna (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The diseased was → Shouldn't this be were? As it wasn't just one person who received the medal to wear.
 * Possibly. It seems all the same to me, but I am not the native speaker here :) Surtsicna (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The placement of the blue background quote box is odd, because it's creating an unnecessary white space to the right of it, underneath the images of the coins.
 * I don't see the white space and, in any case, I wouldn't know what to do with the quote box. I can't move it to the left because of the list and I can't move it elsewhere because it is relevant to the section (and the list). What do you suggest? Surtsicna (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe because I have a bigger screen, but the box was interfering with the layout. I've moved it now. ` — Calvin999
 * The Henrician practice → Can Henrician be linked?
 * To what do you think I should link it? It refers to Henry VIII, linked in the preceding paragraph. Surtsicna (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I know, but some people may not have got that. I've personally never heard of it before. — Calvin999  20:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * Summary


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

COmpact, but really interesting article. Hardly any issues to comment on really. On hold for 7 days. — Calvin999 17:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Outcome
 * Thank you. I am honored to have such a veteran review it. Surtsicna (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that's kind. — Calvin999  20:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Pass or Fail: