Talk:Rube Goldberg Machine Contest

Terrible
This article is terrible. The first sentence tells us who sponsors the contest and who financially backs it. Then it goes on to tell where it is held. How about saying what the contest is in the intro paragraph? 74.93.230.113 (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

??
in 2007 they used 345 step. then in in 2011 they break the 230-step record by using 244 steps??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.160.127.10 (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Rube Goldberg Machine Contest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080406000907/http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/04/05/goldberg.contest.ap/index.html to http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/04/05/goldberg.contest.ap/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

On recent redirection
Just my impression: independently notable; needs more sources but I don't see a reason why this shouldn't work as a standalone article. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:01, 29 November 2018 (UTC)