Talk:Ruben Kihuen

Recentism
The whole sexual misconduct allegation section is out of line with too much detail. It needs to be trimmed down to the bare essentials. His chief of staff trying to find jobs for his staffers, for instance, is inconsequential. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:Recentism is an essay, not a Wikipedia policy or guideline. It is overridden by policies and guidelines, such as WP:RS and WP:WEIGHT. Wikipedia policies and guidelines basically say that we follow the news judgments of WP:RSs, and if many WP:RSs cover a subject, we include it in proportion to that coverage. WP:RSs may (or may not) exercise bad news judgment by giving extensive coverage to sex scanals, but that's that's how we defined Wikipedia coverage.
 * The essay Recentism itself includes a Debate over Recentism with a section, Recentism as a positive, which gives many arguments for recentism. --Nbauman (talk) 16:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Ruben Kihuen
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Ruben Kihuen's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Generalelection": From Catherine Cortez Masto:  From 2016 United States House of Representatives elections in Nevada:  From Nevada's 1st congressional district:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)