Talk:Rubik's Revolution

Why was this page included in the Rubik's Cube template under Rubik's Cubes? As this is an electronic game and fundamentally different from Rubik's Cube, it should be taken off that list.

Actually i agree as well... is there someone willing to do that for us? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.36.204 (talk) 11:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Someone should post a picture, will someone please do that 70.237.234.59 (talk) 04:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Must it be emphasized?
The latest edit says "It must be emphasized that this gameplay is completely different from that of the Rubik's Cube, despite the suggestion inherent in the game's outward appearance." Why must it be emphasized? Isn't simply stating "this doesn't work like a Rubik's cube, this is how it does work" more factual and encyclopedic? Saying "it must be emphasized" is too conversational. Statements that something must be emphasized belongs on the talk pages. Horatiopositronic (talk) 14:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)