Talk:Ruby chocolate

Advertising tone
This article reads like a press release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.75.15.184 (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes it does. It also is poorly sourced, mostly relying on pre-release PR wire hype. The only source that speaks to notability at all is the one review of the Kit-Kat bar. And that is even a blog. oknazevad (talk) 00:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

WP:IDIOM
It says "Kit Kat Canada announced the release of the ruby chocolate in Canada in a tweet." WP:IDIOM 70.27.33.117 (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Authenticity debate
I demand for lack of bias there be a civil dispute and debate regarding the authenticity of ruby chocolate backed up by sources for both sides of the argument, I am currently on neither side although my biases cause me to want this to be authentic. 86.187.165.45 (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Current status in the United States
As noted in the article, the company received a 15-month temporary marketing permit for their "ruby chocolate" in 2019, with the FDA commenting that it "deviates from the current standards of identity for chocolate products in terms of its final composition, taste, and color". Those 15 months expired several years ago. What is the current treatment of this product in the U.S. code? Do the FDA regulations treat it as a distinct product, or is it considered to fit into a pre-existing category? It does seem to currently be offered for sale in the United States. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)