Talk:Rudé právo

Untitled
I think that this article is little bit misguiding, particularly link to "Internet portal of the newspaper". At least the link should be deleted, it is like if in the article about Third Reich would be link to "Internet portal of the government" linking to http://www.bundesregierung.de/en — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.160.10.145 (talk) 23:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Ecadre's NPOV complaint
I hardly know where to start with the problems with this "article". There are no citations, full of gossip-like remarks and astonishing inaccuracy. Whatever you think of the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia it cannot be dismissed as "a few dozen thousand aged hard-liners" when it is a Party with well over 100,000 members that regularly gets around 20% of the popular vote in the national elections.

This article is ridiculous in the extreme and I going to look for a way that it can be flagged up for deletion unless someone radically reauthors it. [ User:Ecadre 19 Apr 2006]


 * Ecadre obviously has an extreme POV, and no real arguments. His statement about KSČM's political success is undeniable fact, although the membership numbers are merely wishful thinking (it was barely over 100 000 two years ago - see MF DNES daily 6 Nov 2004, and the inherited pre-1989 cadre is dying off quickly: average age was 68 years - ibid, and for example in South Bohemian Region membership dropped by 7 % in 2005 - MFD 6 Mar 2006, local edition).


 * However this is beside the article's point, which is that most of their members, let alone voters, wouldn't touch Haló noviny with a ten-foot pole. --Malyctenar 15:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Righty guy, would you never accept your own POV? Ecadre may have a leftist POV, you have a rightist one; neutrality can't be obtained but by exposing both views on the issue. --200.85.114.110 22:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Separation
i think makes sense to create 2 separate articles:pravo, the current newspaper, and Rudé právo, the old one. Otherwise it's misleading for the articles linking here.--Desyman44 (talk) 15:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I splitted the two articles and fixed all the interwiki (i hope). If sb wants to revert smth, please discuss first here, since it took quite a lot to do the job...thanks!--Desyman44 (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)