Talk:Rude Boy (Rihanna song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

I'll review the article and list issues if existent. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * References: The date format should be the same everywhere., but this won't majorly affect the review.


 * GA review (see here) for what the criteria is.


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

The article is greatly written, just fix the date format in the references, and I'm gladly passing it for GA status. Congrats to all editors and the nominator, Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon!, who helped make this happen! TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I didn't think the article was this good to not have anything to amend, I would have thought there would be some points? Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon!  11:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, if you would like to improve more, the personnel section could be a bit better referenced, but I didn't consider important enough to prevent GA status.  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 17:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * So that is the only other thing in the entire article you think should be amended? Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon!  18:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. If you feel my judgements are inadequate, then request a reassessment, but I stand by my review.  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 18:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)