Talk:Rudravaram, Nandyal district

Requested move 29 May 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 09:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Rudravaram (Nandyal district) → Rudravaram, Kurnool district – Moving back to original title "Rudravaram, Kurnool district", as Rudravaram (Nandyal district) is different from this. Unfortunately the enwiki article is a stub to provide useful information about place. this is based on the distinct articles in tewiki. Arjunaraoc (talk) 00:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 19:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Arjunaraoc: This article is not linked to any article on tewiki. Can you please be more specific, and update the article accordingly? Only then will I be able to move this page, because I have no idea about how to do the post-move cleanup in this case. Thanks! &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:40, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @CX Zoom,@Crouch, Swale I studied the references provided and came to the conclusion that this stub article maps with village in Rudravaram mandal of Nandyal district. I updated the article and the tewiki link.  There is a separate article for village in Kurnool district (te:రుద్రవరం (కర్నూలు మండలం)), for which there is no corresponding article in Enwiki. Therfore I withdraw my move request. Arjunaraoc (talk) 05:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If its ambiguous due to another in Kurnool district then I'll withdraw my support as well.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 07:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.