Talk:Rule of Two

Merge

 * I oppose the merge. This article is so big, it deserves to be on its own.
 * Seconded.
 * I concur; its large enough that it deserves its own entry.
 * Yes, there should be no merge. The article should stay an individual article. However, it does need to be expanded. --OldRightist 23:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's way too big, and it's not just the sith. But maybe Two should be capitilized. And the page bigger. --Jordan
 * word to the above.


 * Then I shall remove the notice, since it seems consensus is not to merge. --maru (talk) contribs 06:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This topic absolutely does not merit its own article. You are talking about a pedagogical principle in a fictional universe, the only real claim for notability resting on a single spoken line by Yoda in a movie. This article should be merged with Sith. I really wonder how you think there is a "consensus" against merging when all you have is a handful of unsigned comments against merging.  There has been no discussion or debate here and I think the arguments are far stronger in favor of merging than against.67.159.78.196 (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Revan? Malak?
Darth Revan and Darth Malak have not been during the Rule of Two. They have been in the time of the old republic! At this time there was no Rule of Two! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.63.118.91 (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC).