Talk:Rumaliza

slave trade not mentioned in the summary ?
I'm not very familiar with the history of Congo, and I may put myself in a controversy... but I see that the body of the article mentions slave trade quite extensively, but the summary of the article at the top only mentions _ivory_ trade. I'm editing it, because it seems reasonable. However I'm interested in elements of history going one way or another.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farialima (talk • contribs) 17:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * in fact it had been removed by an anonymous user -- re-adding it Farialima (talk) 22:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)