Talk:Rumor spread in social network

Original research
Seven years have elapsed since the deletion discussion, and not much has changed. The topic is clearly notable, but the article is orphaned not connected to its source material, and redacted in a non-encyclopedic style ({{tq|By carefully scrutinizing the existing literature, we categorize the works the latter suggesting or at least original synthesis.

What to do with this article?

Notifying (alas, substantial additions have been made by unregistered users, lately):
 * {{ping|Liwenouyang|p=}} (first and main author of the article, who did nothing else since then);
 * {{ping|Aoidh|LadyofShalott|Boleyn|p=}} (who flagged the article);
 * {{ping|Magioladitis|p=}} (who changed some math expressions);
 * {{ping|Dennis Brown|PWilkinson|My very best wishes|Warden|Kiefer.Wolfowitz|Colapeninsula|p=}} (who took part in the deletion discussion).

Regards, Maëlan 18:04, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * on the main page for rumor, there is discussion about folding this page in as a section. That seems like the best option. Mccartneyac (talk) 16:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)