Talk:Rumors (Lindsay Lohan song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 10:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I will review this article :) Till 10:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Lead

 * It was released as the first single from the album --> so lead single?
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The lead and "background/composition" section state that it derives from the "teen pop" genre although the Infobox does not.
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * critics --> music critics
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It received mixed reviews from critics, who deemed it as infectious, yet unnecessary. --> Did some critics call it infectious and unnecessary? Or did some call it infectious, while others called it unnecessary?
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * An accompanying music video was directed by Jake Nava and features Lohan in several scenes dancing in club like surroundings and running from the paparazzi, emphasizing the song's theme. --> Something annoys me here. It seems hard to digest.
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Background and composition

 * New York, New York -> Distinguish from city and state please
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The lead states that the song was released on 21 September 2004 although this is nowhere in the article (besides infobox).
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Reception

 * The song received generally mixed reviews from contemporary critics. -> Start with the song's actual title, "Rumors", and again - music critics.
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Some quotes could do with some paraphrasing
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it is worthy of mentioning that it was certified Gold by ARIA (in Australia).
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It also charted in Sweden and Netherlands.
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Promotion

 * Commissioned is spelt wrong.
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There are some commas that need to be put in the music video section for a better flow.
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Credits and personnel

 * Make a column for personnel.
 * Why is this necessary? - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Because it looks more appealing Till 03:15, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Track listings

 * Instead of [...], use (...)
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Weekly charts

 * Need to be separated into 2004 and 2005 peaks.
 * - Saulo  Talk to Me 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Overall

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Short article but good, giving time to fix the issues.
 * Till 10:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Short article but good, giving time to fix the issues.
 * Till 10:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Till 10:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)