Talk:Runa Laila

Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh
It has been discovered that this book: Contains significant amounts of material plagiarized from Wikipedia articles. (Some other books from the same publisher also have this problem). There is no practical way of determining which material came from Wikipedia, and which came from other sources. Further, widespread plagiarism is an indication of poor scholarship. For those reasons, and according to Wikipedia policy, WP:CIRCULAR, I will deleting all citations to the book. However I will not delete the material that cites it, as there's no indication that the material is inaccurate. For more background, see WP:RSN, or the archive after it goes there.  Will Beback   talk    22:24, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Gupta, Om. Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Gyan Publishing House, 2006. ISBN 8182053897, 9788182053892.


 * You are right ... that "encyclopedia" is nothing but a wikipedia mirror. The publisher has made it a business to collect pages from wikipedia and turn them into a book. --Ragib (talk) 22:31, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.aimraj.com/
 * Triggered by  on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Runa Laila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080723213331/http://chowk.com/articles/8459 to http://www.chowk.com/articles/8459

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Devdas vandalism (edit conflict)
I went through the article about the 1982 film that the singer can be heard in the 1982 Devdas film since her name is mentioned in this article, not the article about the 2013 one. As her name is not mentioned in that article, she didn’t sing in that 2013 film. —47.156.8.159 (talk)

This dispute is unnecessary. —47.156.8.159 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

IMDb is not a reliable source.
How is IMDb not a reliable source? --47.156.8.159 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Runa Laila
There really wasn't much material at the source article for a merge to this one; the main difference was in the formatting. Personally, I think the list of awards that is already in this article is tidier than the multiple tables at the other one. If anyone strongly disagrees and wants to bring the tables over, the pre-redirected article is here. Joyous! | Talk 00:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)