Talk:Runar Søgaard

POV
The short article is terrible POV and currently sounds like a defense speech concerning Søgaard's anti-Islamic comments. I, as an uninformed visitor of the article also finds it confusing that the article claimed that his comments on Buddha didn't get the same attention, yet it is discussed in the very Aftonbladet article used as a source for the claim. I also find calling Jan Guillou "pro-Islam" to be quite controversial and so I put in a source template, but it's possible I'm just uninformed on the subject. - quispiamtalk [Anton Nordenfur] 04:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Runar Søgaard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050419083742/http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789,633287,00.html to http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789,633287,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)