Talk:Russ's Market

Can someone please give me some feedback on what, specifically about this article is unacceptable? I'd be happy to make whatever edits are necessary for it to pass public scrutiny.

Thank you! Matt Gersib Mattgersib (talk) 23:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

7/1/09, 6:13pm, CDT --

Starting to add citations and footnotes, as available online. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattgersib (talk • contribs) 23:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Starting to add citations and footnotes, as available online. I believe that, if you look at other grocery store/chain pages, you'll see that this is very similar (or better) than the average. Please let me know if you don't concur, or point me to better examples. Thank you! Mattgersib (talk) 23:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to request that this article be revisited for suitability please. Also, can the Title please be changed so that it shows up as the proper name, "Russ's Market"? We would very much appreciate it.

Thank you! Mattgersib (talk) 17:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd get a clear claim of notability in the article. Once that's done and it's likely the article will stay around, then the title can be fixed. —C.Fred (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The complete article can be referenced back to the company's own Web site. Would a reference back to that published article on the site be what you're looking for? Thank you for the feedback. Mattgersib (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC)


 * It would be better to have a link to the original publisher of the story and not the company's reprint. —C.Fred (talk) 16:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

That's going to be a challenge for a lot of that company history, simply because a lot of the information is available online (that I have been able to find). The company record is the only available linkable document. Mattgersib (talk) 19:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC)


 * If I'm understanding correctly, the company hasn't been covered in newspapers and the like, so it's not generally notable. The question then is, what specific notability requirement for companies does it meet? —C.Fred (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

I've added another reference to the Nebraska Department of Economic Development, regarding their recognition of the company's reusable grocery bag program. Mattgersib (talk) 22:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)