Talk:Russian Liberation Movement

Violation of NPOV
I just think this line is too POV in my perspective. Of course I won't delete it, first because I'm not a registered user and I'm not fond of editing articles if I'm not registered (unless my edits are not SO significant). However I do think this line "The main focus of the movement was the destruction of Bolshevik tyranny" is too POV and shall be revised and tried to be substituted by a more NPOV line like "The main focus of the movement was the destruction of Bolshevik government". Also I would support the supression of the term "democratic" and just say that this movement propugnated for the substitution of their policies in order to keep faithful to NPOV. ~ ~  ~  ~  ZealotKommunizma

Fair use rationale for Image:RussianLiberationMovement.gif
Image:RussianLiberationMovement.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:NTS-Vyugler.jpg
The image Image:NTS-Vyugler.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --00:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Russian Liberation Movement is collaborationist movement
How there can be any difference?--Dojarca (talk) 13:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Modern NOD in Russia?
Apparently there's a modern NOD in Russia, but they seem to be anti breaking Russia up, anti oligarchs, anti nationalism, etc. and support Putin, etc. They're the anti fifth column. Do they have a separate article? Do they share the same name on purpose?

-G — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.53.84.53 (talk) 22:25, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Redirect
I redirected the page to Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia, as the best redirect target. The article is largely unsourced WP:OR, tagged since 2021, with the cited material being about the flag. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 09:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)