Talk:Russian battleship Evstafi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Keristrasza (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Well-written:
 * the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct
 * it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
 * Factually accurate and verifiable:
 * it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout
 * it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
 * it contains no original research
 * Broad in its coverage:
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
 * Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias
 * Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
 * Illustrated, if possible, by images:
 * images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
 * images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions