Talk:Russian battleship Imperator Nikolai I (1889)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jhbuk (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

No real problems:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Good. I suppose in some areas, the writing could be made more varied (eg:the first paragraph: She did this, she did that etc)?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Can I just ask why references are not put in the infobox, although I assume this came from one of the books.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * There isn't a vast amount here, when compared to some articles, but I can't see anywhere the article is seriously lacking, considering there is the main article Imperator Aleksandr II class battleship which contains most information about construction, design etc, so that level of detail is not required here.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The three images illustrate the ship well. While not required for GA, the images do not have alt text.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass Can't really think of anything more to write.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass Can't really think of anything more to write.