Talk:Russian battleship Knyaz Suvorov/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Buggie111 (talk · contribs) 15:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Oh, Sturm. C'mon. Any more and you'll nominate Sevastopol for FAR. Any more jumping on my work will result in me SUING YOU IN A COURT OF LAW IN TRENTON, NEW JERSEY!!!!! (hope you get the joke). Still, great article. Look over Talk:Russian battleship Knyaz Suvorov/GA1 to see Benea's concerns about a previous version. Buggie111 (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't read Taras, which is lacking in bibliographic info anyways, and Watt doesn't have anything to offer that the others don't.
 * The photo in the infobox wasn't published in Russia, AFAIK, but in the UK, and so doesn't need Russian license.
 * Yeah, I'll have to dig Pleshakov out and add the Dogger Bank material. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Dogger Bank info added.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)