Talk:Russian battleship Navarin/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 22:49, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my initial comments up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 22:49, 13 October 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Design and description, "This unusual arrangement gave the ship her unusual nickname of Factory" - unusual...unusual
 * Oh my, yes.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * File:RUS Battleship Navarin.jpg has absolutely no information, and a copyright tag that only applies if we know the death date of the author.
 * This photo wasn't even in the article, but I'm now using File:Battleship Navarin.jpg which is sourced to Cassell's History of the Russo-Japanese War, published in 1905.
 * The same applies to File:RUS Battleship Navarin underway.jpg
 * Deleted this one.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The same applies to File:RUS Battleship Navarin underway.jpg
 * Deleted this one.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

One prose niggle and (the main reason I'm holding instead of immediately passing) both images have licensing problems. Once these are addressed, I think the article should be good to go. Dana boomer (talk) 23:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:17, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, everything looks good, so now passing to GA. Dana boomer (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)