Talk:Russian battleship Slava/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly! Dana boomer (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

This article looks great, and so I am passing it to GA status. The only suggestion I would have at this point, before A-class or FAC, would be to explain why she had a greater displacement and draft than as designed, in the first paragraph of the Description section. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)