Talk:Russian battleship Tri Sviatitelia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Nothing major, but in the refit section, you have "4.7-inch" but "six-inch" in the same sentence; it should probably be "6-inch" for parallel structure.
 * Done.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * You might try looking at Halpern for more information on the ship's WWI service. I don't know if there's anything else useful, but it's worth a look. Parsecboy (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't have Halpern, but it's pretty unlikely that McLaughlin and Nekrasov missed anything of significance.
 * I'll have a look through after work tonight. Parsecboy (talk) 19:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That would be great if you could.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There indeed was a bit to add. Parsecboy (talk) 10:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The first paragraph in the service history section barely mentions this ship. Can you fix that?
 * Do you mean the WWI section?
 * Yeah. Parsecboy (talk) 19:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * You might add an explanation for the seizure of the ships by the Allies at the end of WWI (namely, the German surrender).
 * Done.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The lead image needs a source and publication date, or else a fair-use rationale. I know, it's a pain in the ass.
 * Indeed--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article. Parsecboy (talk) 10:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article. Parsecboy (talk) 10:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)