Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

This review is open

I nominated Ruth Bader Ginsburg for GA because I believe it's now a good example of an article about a U.S. Supreme Court Justice: not too long but not too short, good prose, well sourced, and very clearly and well organized. The article has come a long way, overcome numerous past issues, and now is deserving of GA status in my opinion.

Please comment below and tell me if I'm right or wrong, and, if wrong, what you would suggest to bring it up to GA level.

Thank you. --NickDupree (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Ray Talk 20:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for taking the time for such a comprehensive review, and I hope your suggestions can get the article to GA status. I plan to implement many of your suggestions soon. NickDupree (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC)