Talk:Rutherfordium/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 03:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations:none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:21, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:21, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Excellent, I have no hesitation in listing this as a GA. congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 03:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * This is massively improved since my last review. Prose good and complies sufficiently with MoS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References appear good, Rs and I assume GF for those which I cannot access.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough without unnecessary detail.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Licensed, tagged and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: