Talk:Ryan Coetzee

Vandalism
It appears the creator of this page, Mulaudzi8, has deliberately been 'sanitising' the content in order to present a better view of this politician. No doubt he works and is paid by the political party and should refrain from removing anything his political masters don't like. This is not what Wikipedia is about! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.177.21.171 (talk) 20:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I've added in / altered some text to cover both the allegations and the outcome of the investigation into them. If we're going to mention the former, I don't see what the case is for not also mentioning the latter? I've checked the text against the cited sources to make sure it's in line with them, so hopefully that covers all the issues there have been in the back and forth editing recently. Markpackuk (talk) 10:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Adding the outcome of an investigation is reasonable, so long as the controversy is not hidden or buried amongst the main paragraphs. I believe this is the vandal's intent. Ironically, the main Democratic Alliance page has a separate section for controversy, so they have set the precedent themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.177.65.121 (talk) 12:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)