Talk:Ryan Cresswell/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cloudz679 (talk · contribs) 08:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

The prose is very stop and start and needs major improvements. Further, the article is littered with idioms and metaphor, jargon, typos, inconsistency and ambiguous wording. Suggest the nominator reads through the article to identify problems as a first step, then send to Peer review before re-nomination. C679 08:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)