Talk:Ryan Gosling/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bruce Campbell (talk · contribs) 03:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

The pose and overall writing is very good, and it's a really interesting article which goes well over his career, so I won't bother going to far into other than that. Publications like Variety and Entertainment Weekly need to be wikilinked, but that's a minor issue. Also, you mention Roger Ebert three times and Peter Travers twice, and "of the Chicago Sun-Times" only needs to be written once, not all the three times. Wikilink Roger Ebert, too.

The only major issue which really doesn't match GA standards is some small reference errors. Some references say "retreived on __" and some references say "accessed on ___". For example, the first reference says retrieved, and the second says accessed. If you could make them all consistent in that regard then I would say the article can be passed.

In addition, Youtube and Facebooks are not deemed reliable sources. Some other references, like 47, 152, and 157 are not referenced correctly at all. Also, in references, publications like The Garudian and Entertainment Weekly should be linked. Otherwise, though, the article is pretty close to passing. Bruce Campbell (talk) 14:48, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Passed now! Good work. Bruce Campbell (talk) 22:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Great! Thanks for taking the time to review it Popeye191 (talk) 23:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)