Talk:Ryan Lavery

GA failed

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 15:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I pretty much agree that it fails. Amanda who? Played by whom? Patrij (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Tragic Hero OR?
"His well-intentioned judgment calls often land him in more trouble than good, he is characteristic of the tragic hero, often seemingly unaware of this flaw." As someone who took part in the GA discussion noted, this claim reeks of original research. What's more, the only outside articles in which I've seen this claim seen to have lifted it from this page. Willcrys 84 (talk) 02:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)