Talk:Ryugyong Hotel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: None found

Linkrot: One found and tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * REasonably well written and sufficiently compliant with MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Several citation needed tags, one dead link. Citations need to be correctly and consistently formatted so that the source is clear.  page numbers need to be included for books and journals.
 * What makes {http://www.orientalarchitecture.com/} or {http://www.damninteresting.com/} reliable sources?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article covers the subject in sufficient depth, but one anomaly is mentioned on the talk page Talk:Ryugyong Hotel. Can this be cleared up?  As it stands this is confusing.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Unbiased
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * OK,
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Tagged and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days for above concerns to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, all good now, passing as GA. Recommendations for the future: Consitent dates on citations, e.g all in Britishor Us format. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

I've addressed all remaining issues. I'm trying to locate a physical copy of the Japan Economic Journal article to confirm that it's a source for the entire paragraph it's cited in. Should have that in a couple of days. Rodface (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Rice's collection is apparently gone, I'll be looking for this next. Rodface (talk) 21:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)