Talk:Síyáh-Chál

Báb's prediction fall Qajár dynasty
In it is stated: "... The site was used for a convocation of national representatives (Majlis-i-Mu'assisán) in 1925 at which the fall of the Qajár dynasty was announced... Believers at the time kept recalling that the Exalted Báb predicted that the Qajár dynasty would fall 1,000 (lunar) months from His Revelation. However, research must be made to find the source." Wiki-uk (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Serious quality issues
The article seems to consist largely of misunderstandings. It was not built as a dungeon, and siyah chal was not a common term for dungeons, and there were not a lot of high-rigour dungeons with this typical design, and so forth. To understand what it was, one has to understand how the water supply in Tehran (and many other cities) worked, i.e., intermittently, via above-ground open water channels that were flushed with water, in rotation, every so many days. This meant there was a need for water reservoirs in the suburbs and in the courtyards of, or underneath, wealthy houses and (naturally) under bath houses. The photo seems to show a main entrance to the bathhouse. Presumably the bathhouse had fallen out of use, or a more constant water supply had been arranged for it - and the empty reservoir was pressed into use as a dungeon, for a period. At that point, it was christened "black hole," for as Iranian prisons went it was particularly bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sen McGlinn (talk • contribs) 19:50, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Baha'u'llah's vision
I would like to add this to the article as a separate title, may be as Baha'u'llah's vision or Baha'i faith and Erotica. Or may be "mystico-erotic" dimension of Baha'u'llah's vision.
 * I raised My hand once more and uncovered her breast that had been hidden beneath her gown. A puzzled Maiden asks Bahá'u'lláh who He is. He replies, "A servant of God and the Son of His maidservant." Serv181920 (talk) 11:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)


 * And this is because you found an interesting insight from the writings of Baha'u'llah that will educate the reader about his experience? Or you found an obscure quote that, if excerpted just right and taken out of context, makes Baha'u'llah look bad? Either way, it's OR to quote primary sources without some commentary or precedent. For example, Adamson's A to Z of the Baha'i Faith has an entry for the Siyah Chal (not for Maiden of Heaven). It takes a quote from Baha'u'llah on his experience, and another quote from Shoghi Effendi. Those would be justifiable to quote. Similarly, Smith's Concise Encyclopedia has an entry for the Siyah Chal but not Maiden of Heaven. Cuñado ☼ - Talk  17:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)