Talk:S.A.

Requested move 15 June 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: malformed request. DrKiernan (talk) 13:37, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

S.A. → SA (A dab page). – No, quite the reverse: I want S.A. (Corporation) moved over this one. Currently, this redirect is misleading, and confusing, as discussed and closed at WP:RFD. Still confusing me here now. Move S.A. (corporation) over this with the appropriate hatnote if we have consensus for the move, the hatnote follows. SA is probably a step too far, right now. Si Trew (talk) 08:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy procedural close This is a duplication of the request currently exists at talk:S.A. (corporation) that is the inverse of this move request ( "S.A. (corporation)" -> "S.A." ) ; except that this request is thoroughly mixed up, due to the variance between the statement on the nomination template and the nomination list, and the fact that the request ends up as a roll over of a redirect on top of an article, which would need a deletion discussion instead. -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.