Talk:S/O Satyamurthy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 04:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

I will review this article first thing tomorrow. Thank you. Looks good at first glance. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 04:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments

 * Lead
 * "The film revolves around three characters; one follows his heart, the second uses his brain and the third uses his brawn. " — "The film revolves around three characters; the first follows his heart, the second uses his brain and the third uses his brawn."
 * ✅ Rephrased. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Plot
 * Wikilink Ooty and Reddiarpatti.
 * "apologizes" — "apologises".
 * Two changes done. Reddiarpatti does not have an article. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Production
 * "rumored" — "rumoured".
 * ✅ Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * "Filming began at Ramanaidu Studios in Hyderabad on 10 April 2014." — Shift it to filming section and change "Filming began on 22 September at a Hyderabad mall." to "Principal photography began on 22 September at a Hyderabad-based shopping mall."
 * Actually, its the production works that have begun on 10 April 2014. Made the second change. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:48, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * What exactly does "production works" mean? Is it Pre-production works? — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 08:56, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No. I meant the official launch ceremony. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If that's the case, then rephrase it as "The film was officially launched at Ramanaidu Studios in Hyderabad on 10 April 2014." — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 09:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * "Ileana D'Cruz, the female lead in Srinivas' films Jalsa (2008) and Julai, reportedly agreed to perform an item number in the film (her comeback in Telugu cinema) for a high fee." — If D'Cruz was in the film, then why isn't she mentioned in the "Cast" section? —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 09:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like Miniapolis removed the content "Her inclusion however remained unconfirmed" during the c/e. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thought as much. I have removed the info on her anyways. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 09:07, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I should have done this earlier. Anyways, Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:08, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 09:10, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * "he asked Srinivas for the name." — "he requested Srinivas to use the name for the titular character's son."
 * "Arjun trained hard for the fight sequences, and hired a well-known gymnast to learn flips, somersaults and other gymnastic skills for his stunts." — Who's the gymnast? If there's no info on him, then rephrase the sentence as simply "Arjun learned flips, somersaults and other gymnastic skills to perform his stunts."
 * Wikilink Dubai.
 * All done. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:13, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Any news on Brahmi's inclusion?
 * No. He can be seen in the film, in its plot and in its reviews. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That's alright. Just a general question. Not necessary though. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 09:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Wikilink Peter Hein.
 * ✅ Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:36, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Don't see any issues with the article. It passes the GA criteria. Congratulations, Pavan! —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me '' 06:24, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing this article, ! This happens to be my fifteenth consecutive GA success! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:27, 18 July 2015 (UTC)