Talk:SAAN

Worth keeping?
Not sure about the SAN and Saane additions, but there's an existing redirect at Saan which merits a mention. Not sourced in the target article, but Britannica seems to support it. Pam D  13:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Given the case insensitivity of Wikipedia link interpretation, it makes good sense for Saan to be on the list. That makes three links to Wikipedia articles. It is not clear to me if any of the articles could be considered the primary topic, per [WP:D]], and lack of a primary topic would argue for a disambiguation page. There are other potential SAAN candidates that could have articles written about them, for instance, SAAN Global and Swiss Australian Academic Network. --Mark viking (talk) 21:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I would keep but move to Saan (disambiguation). bd2412  T 15:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)