Talk:SAS President Kruger/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Well constructed, will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Section 1; Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and links in right place.
 * Section 2; para 1; Remove the dup-link of "Royal Navy"
 * Section 2; para 1; Link "President of South Africa"
 * Section 2; para 1; Is the name of wife of the Navy Chief of Staff, Rear-Admiral Hugo Biermann, available?


 * Section 2; para 1; "with Captain M.R. Terry-Lloyd was in command" -> "with Captain M.R. Terry-Lloyd in command"
 * Section 2; para 2; Link "Argentina"
 * Section 2; para 3; Why is "Dreadnought" mentioned in italics?
 * All ship names are italicized.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Section 2; para 3; Remove the dup-link of "Canary Islands"
 * Section 2; para 3; "New York City" was linked twice in the para.
 * Section 2; para 3; Remove the dup-link of "corvettes"
 * Section 2; para 3; Change 1979–80 to 1979–1980 per MOS:DATERANGE
 * Section 2.2.1; What is "PWO"? Never defined in the previous para
 * External link check shows one dead link (saafmuseum.org.za).
 * Deleted.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Any update on this? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the lengthy delay. All done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)