Talk:SB Centaur/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 00:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Will look at this one. —Ed!(talk) 00:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * No problems with dub or dab links, however, checklink article shows one recently dead link.
 * Sigh. It went down seven days ago. Renewed.


 * Copyvio tool is showing a yellow light, I suspect it's because of the quote but picking up a few other things too, namely similar phrasing on some sections ("damaged by a tug"; "Dunkirk, Calais, Antwerp, Ostend, Alderney, Bruges and the Netherlands, from a variety of home ports including Dover, Rochester, London, Lowestoft, Goole, Shoreham, Southampton and Newport." Suggest further rearranging some of these phrases.
 * They came up when I did a pre-nom check. I thought I had fixed them. I have now. Still a high number, but not due to any avoidable closeness, outside of the quote.


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Source spotchecks Refs 9 and 13 are active and back up material in the article.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Not Yet
 * "moving 150 tons of loose cargo at a time" -- whatever convert unit is best here would be helpful.
 * Convert template added to both instances of "tons".


 * "In 1900 there were over 2,000 Thames sailing barges in operation.[4]" -- I imagine these were in private individual employ, vs military, government or large companies? Just want to see if info is out there on it.
 * They were all in private ownership, which I have added. (it was in the source.) I can't find a source splitting the size of the owners. My feel from the sources is that most were owned by medium to large concerns, but there is no quantitative data on this.


 * World War II: "The rest of the conflict was spent doing war work.[9]" -- Any general idea what this work entailed? And was the boat doing this under private ownership or something else? Should be clear.
 * She remained privately owned and doing the same - more or less - as always. Which is why I didn't think to specify. Now specified.


 * Owners: Any way we could get that in a table? And are these dates that the boat was sold? Any info on any of the prices?
 * I had them in a table and it seemed less readable. I will revert to that if it is a deal breaker. I have clarified what the dates mean.


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Pass Images are appropriately cited under CC licenses.
 * 1) Other:
 * On Hold Pending a few fixes. —Ed!(talk) 01:54, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . Thanks for picking this up. I thought that it was going to languish forever. Your points above all addressed. Gog the Mild (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that works! Passing for GA now. —Ed!(talk) 15:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)