Talk:SECR P class

Merge proposal
I propose the merging of this article with the newly formed article SECR P Class 323 Bluebell as I feel that that page does not have sufficient weight of its own to justify an article, but could be made to work with a more detailed description of the four preserved engines in the Preservation section. This could be linked in with the pages for Rolling stock of the Bluebell Railway for three of the engines, and Rolling stock of the Kent & East Sussex Railway (heritage) for the other. Bluebellnutter (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Support merge. Plenty of scope to put a referenced history in the rolling stock article. Mjroots (talk) 16:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Support merge. It's not significant enough for its own page.Duncanbourne (talk) 07:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Support merge, although it should be noted that many preserved steam locomotives have their own pages, if sufficient history is available. EdJogg (talk) 22:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support merge; nine months since the proposal, the SECR P Class 323 Bluebell article is still rather short. -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)