Talk:SEER-SEM

Unreliable source
It appears that Crosstalk will publish vendor-provided articles as long as they are informative to the US DOD community and as such fails WP:Reliable as a source. Toddst1 (talk) 16:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Crosstalk magazine reviews all articles (overreviews them from my experience)

I supposed based on the critera for unreliable source posed above Einsteins theory of relativity is an unreliable source. He published it himself.

Regarding unrelaible sources..l. If the criteria for a reliable source is someone who publishes a totally indepenedent definition of the mathematics behind this model then it is impossible to provide a reliable source. We have articles, a book, thousands of people using this stuff.

We posted this as a service to the community of 10s of thousands of people who use this.

There was once a reference to a book publised on this topic (yes, one written by Dan Galorath so I suppose people woudl call that an unrelaible source) that was deleted. I just dont get this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.246.177 (talk) 14:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I believe that CrossTalk is a reliable source of useful information for the DoD software community. Recommend removing the 'unreliable?' tag.

I read CrossTalk regularly and would agree with the above comment that they're a reliable source. Besides, nearly any publisher will publish "vendor-provided" articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.15.219 (talk) 09:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Article only discusses software estimation models
The SEER family of tools, including SEER-H, include hardware (electrical, mechanical, etc.) cost estimation models, yet formulas provided are for software only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.198.233 (talk) 16:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)