Talk:SFZero

(S)F-Zero
I don't know how much similarity is required for this, so I'll ask: does anyone else thing it's worth including a disambiguating link (I don't know the real term but I know that they're similar in function to disambiguation pages) to F-Zero? That's the first thing I thought of when I saw "SFZero", but that's probably just me. -Unknownwarrior33 03:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 * jkhffhkl 185.139.139.193 (talk) 23:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

SF0 and F-Zero are in no way related nor could they ever be -Kyle Hamilton (I'm to lazy to log in at school) --198.189.164.204 23:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Yup, F-Zero has no connection whatsoever to SFZero (which is usually written SF0 anyway) - also, KYLE! Dragonscales 21:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Clarification
What is the "era of Insatiability" and what does it signify? The article is not clear on that and might need a slight rewrite for clarification in general. Autarch (talk) 12:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Removed because it went unexplained and there was no mention in sources. —151.132.206.26 (talk) 22:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Tone and other issues
The groups section has several sections that seem to be nonsense (e.g. Humanitarian Crisis, The University of Aesthematics, Chrononautic Extropology and Society For Nihilistic Intent And Disruptive Efforts) some of which seem to breach WP:PEACOCK and MOS:OPED (e.g. the use of the word "brilliant").

The tasks section has several alleged tasks written in a very sarcastic manner (e.g. the reference to Johnny Cochrane) - if they're not sourced soon, it's probably best to delete them.

The growth section is just a link of links to places in Wikipedia, with no proof cited that there are even groups active in these places.

If nobody can find sources in the next while, it's probably best to delete the nonsense and leave it in a better state.Autarch (talk) 19:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speaking of other issues: WP:Verifiability. This article cites four sources. All four of these sources are cited for the second paragraph of the lead, which identifies the members (who are unmentioned in two of the sources) of an organization whose name is not found in any of the sources, and closes with an unattributed quote that appears in none of the sources. I have no idea if the entire article is like this, but I tagged it with a cite check. —151.132.206.26 (talk) 22:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay, I’ve gone ahead and purged those crufty lists. Have yet to verify any citations beyond the one paragraph. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)