Talk:SGES

==Hold off on the speedy, please. This is not a typo== --Bxj (talk) 16:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) There is no misspelling in the article title. Typo speedy is template misuse.
 * 2) RussBot's template add should have already explained the purpose of this article.
 * 3) This redirect is created expressly for purposes described in Wikipedia disambiguation guideline, at WP:INTDABLINK. I believe it is at the opposite end of standing against Wikipedia policy.
 * 4) Another point is how redirects shouldn't be deleted so easily as they generally don't cause much harm and are cheap to host. I would provide a link that explains this (a pretty conspicuous guideline article on redirect deletion, IIRC ), but I think I've listed enough arguments already against speedy.


 * There is no need for a redirect from a disambig to a disambig - no one is going to type this in making it an unlikely search term and unnecessary redirect. This has absolutely no user or purpose at all. Please note that INTDABLINK applies when the exceptions are met, which they are not in this case. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 17:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)