Talk:SH2 domain

Untitled
User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Links mislabeled
The links in the section "Available PDB structures" don't go to any of the PDB sites, but to PDBsum. I suggest renaming the section to "Links to PDBsum" and adding another section that redirects to the PDB, similar to what is available for many other protein related pages, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHC1 (one of the proteins that has a SH2 like domain). --Andorsch (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * PDBsum is probably the best single page summary of PDB structure entries available. So I think that it is a good link to use in Wikipedia. But it is probably best that these links are all consistent within Wikipedia.  So I would suggest changing the links to the RCSB PDB website. Alexbateman (talk) 12:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I think there are 122 human proteins containing SH2 - not 111 as article says
I think there are 122 known human proteins containing SH2 - not 111 as article says There are however 111 for which experimental interaction data is available. This is a link to the article i'm basing my idea on: http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ng.3138.html (that's all I know about the topic)

if that's the case then 111 needs to be changed to 122 and the citation needs to be changed.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on SH2 domain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090707043920/http://genetics.uchc.edu:80/faculty/mayer_linkpage.htm to http://genetics.uchc.edu/faculty/mayer_linkpage.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Revisions
I just combined three sections of the old article into a single "Structure and interactions" section and added a few new references. The previous version did not cite many sources, was worded confusingly, and contained many redundant passages. I think the article is cleaner now but it could still use a simple summary in the lede...as it stands now only a biochemist could understand the article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)