Talk:SIG Sauer P226

Point of View
Not exactly what one would call a neutral point of view.
 * If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone &mdash; including you &mdash; can edit any article by clicking the edit this page tab at the top of the page. You don't even need to log in, although there are several reasons why you might want to.  Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes.  If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 00:40, September 23 2004 (UTC)

Long entry now stub
What the hell?? I made a huge long entry about the SIG, and now its a tiny little stub. >;-[ Oh well, I guess thats what it's all about. --User:Gmarine3000 22:43, 11 October 2004

- SIG 229 has a MILLED stainless steel slide, not a forged one. (User: Skull-1)

Canadian Forces
As far as I am concerned, the P226 is still limited issue to JTF2, MPs, and the like, and there are no plans for further issue... Since there are thousands of stored BHPs to be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.242.218 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 16 June 2007

Mk25 v. Navy
From my understanding, the Navy edition is simply a tribute model, while the Mk25 is actually identical to the SEAL's standard issue. The Mk25 features an enhanced trigger, more accurate barrel, a MIL-SPEC rail, and upgraded night sights, which the Navy does not feature. Is this enough to differentiation to remove the Mechanically/Functionally identical sentence, as they are, in fact, not identical?