Talk:SI base unit

Removed table
here's the table I took out in case eveyone wants it back:

---

What?
Ampere, a base unit, is defined in terms of a Newton, which is not a base unit?


 * Yes. I imagine that it is for convenience.  If you like, you can mentally substitute "amount of force required to accelerate a one-kilogram mass at a rate of one meter per second per second" for "newton".  It's also "equal to a flow of one coulomb per second" (ampere).  I am not a physicist, but I don't really see any problem with defining base units in terms of non-base units &mdash; as long as there are no circular references &mdash; since those non-base units are in turn defined in terms of base units.  See also: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/current.html. --Timc 19:43, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

ampere:newton

 * "Yes. I imagine that it is for convenience. If you like, you can mentally substitute "amount of force required to accelerate a one-kilogram mass at a rate of one meter per second per second" for "newton""

Please edit this into the article 02:55, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC) what it means the MASS?

TFA?
See Wikipedia talk:Featured articles. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Kelvin independent?
Since Boltzmann's constant is dimensionless (although mosts chemists and too many physicists seem to be unaware of the fact) the Kelvin is in fact equivalent to (a rather small amount of) energy, which is expressible in the base constants mass, length, and time. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:4507:4B4B:7EE:825F (talk) 15:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)