Talk:SLAPP Suits/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * Add either the " " or "  " template so the reference dates are consistent.
 * The non-free use rationale is in great shape!
 * Well, I stole it from Donald Trump (Last Week Tonight) for the infobox picture and edited it. :) Credit where credit is due to.
 * Couldn't find any issues with the infobox.
 * Very noice!
 * Lead should include stuff from each section, so add something from #Reaction.
 * Lead should include stuff from each section, so add something from #Reaction.

Coal

 * Since the first sentence is in part-tense, the rest should be too (ex. "begins" "began").
 * Assuming you meant past tense, i'll comb through.
 * It should be done now, take a look?
 * Yeah, looks good now.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Even though it's not broken, could you fix the link to Donald Trump?
 * Optional, but I suggest changing "..." to "[...]".
 * I'll take it– ✅
 * Remove the comma after "ignored this letter".
 * Remove the comma after "ignored this letter".

Lawsuit

 * "alleges" "alleged" (already happened)
 * Remove the comma after "part of Murray Energy".
 * Remove the comma after "part of Murray Energy".

Episode

 * In this section, and in others, there are words/events that should be in past-tense since they already happened.
 * I think I fixed that now, but I'm not sure.
 * "a negative content" "negative content"
 * Remove the comma after "another lawsuit".
 * "in squirrel costume" "in a squirrel costume"
 * I did "squirrel costumes", because it's a barbershop quartet and therefore multiple people.
 * "in squirrel costume" "in a squirrel costume"
 * I did "squirrel costumes", because it's a barbershop quartet and therefore multiple people.

Reaction

 * This section looks good.