Talk:SMS Baden (1880)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Starstriker7 - public(talk) 04:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll take on this review. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 04:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Lead

 * You referred to the Baden as the Württemberg once here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starstriker7's Sidekick
 * Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Construction

 * "Dürr boilers" - Can you wikilink this?
 * Can you wikilink "armored citadel"?
 * Unfortunately, there don't appear to be any articles that would be good links. Parsecboy (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Service History

 * Decapitalize "History" in the section title.
 * Can you wikilink "I Division" and "II Division" like in the other articles.
 * "which displaced Württemberg and her three sisters to the II Division." - Wouldn't it make more sense to exchange Württemberg with Baden?
 * Fixed the first and third, as for the links, I'm not entirely sure what the best course of action is. The article will probably end up at I Battle Squadron with section headers for the I and II Divisions, but I'd rather hold off adding links until I actually write the article and set up the section headers. Parsecboy (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I see what you mean. That does make the most sense. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 00:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Criterion 2
The article is thoroughly referenced with offline book references. Inline citations and separate reference sections are used. All clear here.

Criterion 3
The article has no obvious gaps, and is sufficiently focused.

Criterion 4
The article's tone is neutral.

Criterion 5
The article's revision history suggests that the article is stable.

Criterion 6
Both articles' images check out.

Overall comments
Keep 'em coming. You are doing a great job. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 04:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. I'll pass this article momentarily. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 00:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)